Would DCU's Superman Kill? Gunn Says Yes, Reluctantly

One of superhero fandom's most enduring debates revolves around Superman's moral code: Would the Man of Steel ever take a life? Henry Cavill's iteration famously killed General Zod as an absolute last resort in the DCEU to prevent further loss of innocent lives. But with David Corenswet stepping into the iconic red boots for James Gunn's DCU reboot, fans are wondering how this brighter, more hopeful Superman would handle similar impossible choices.

This fresh take presents a stark contrast to Zack Snyder's grounded interpretation, showcasing a Superman who demonstrates profound compassion for all living beings - humans, animals, and even alien creatures alike. For those newly discovering the character, this naturally raises the question: Why wouldn't this paragon of justice ever cross that lethal line?

Corenswet addressed this directly in a recent Wired interview, perfectly capturing Superman's defining ethos: "At his core, Superman maintains an unshakable belief in the inherent goodness within everyone - sometimes to his own detriment," the actor explained. "That idealism extends even to those actively trying to harm him."

DCU architect James Gunn expanded on this perspective in the same interview: "This Superman fundamentally respects the sanctity of all life. Taking another being's existence simply isn't part of his nature." However, Gunn offered an important qualification regarding extreme circumstances: "I don't subscribe to absolutist interpretations though. If preventing catastrophic loss of innocent lives absolutely required that terrible choice? Yes, he would make that sacrifice - though it would haunt him forever."

Spoiler Alert: Major plot details for Superman follow: